<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop Focusing on ums and ahs!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldchampionevaluator.com/toastmasters/stop-focusing-on-ums-and-ahs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldchampionevaluator.com/toastmasters/stop-focusing-on-ums-and-ahs/</link>
	<description>evaluating like a champion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://worldchampionevaluator.com/toastmasters/stop-focusing-on-ums-and-ahs/comment-page-1/#comment-8302</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldchampionevaluator.com/?p=611#comment-8302</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll meet you halfway. Um&#039;s and Ah&#039;s give the appearance of uncertainty and desperation. 

There is a wide range of how badly these are abused. I think tracking them/dinging them is effective - I know I&#039;m only called on them once or twice a year now. 

The other argument, that lack of um or ah&#039;s does not make a speaker more engaging is also true. A boring speaker is still a boring speaker - but at least they take less time being boring. 

Take the confidence from getting rid of Um&#039;s and Ah&#039;s and pour it into your writing and delivery style. It all works together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll meet you halfway. Um&#8217;s and Ah&#8217;s give the appearance of uncertainty and desperation. </p>
<p>There is a wide range of how badly these are abused. I think tracking them/dinging them is effective &#8211; I know I&#8217;m only called on them once or twice a year now. </p>
<p>The other argument, that lack of um or ah&#8217;s does not make a speaker more engaging is also true. A boring speaker is still a boring speaker &#8211; but at least they take less time being boring. </p>
<p>Take the confidence from getting rid of Um&#8217;s and Ah&#8217;s and pour it into your writing and delivery style. It all works together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

